<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: our secret agent man infiltrates wikipedia.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=24" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?p=24</link>
	<description>The Eddy lab: genome sequence analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:54:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Eddy</title>
		<link>http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?p=24&#038;cpage=1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?p=24#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to note that we abide by Wiki&#039;s culture, including NPOV and no original research. The nature of the articles themselves in this section of RNA Biology is Wikipedia-like, for starters: they&#039;re essentially minireviews, pulling together the literature. The RNA Biology paper is peer reviewed research, and it becomes the primary citation for the accompanying Wikipedia page; the Wiki page is not the original research. 

The goal here is simple and straightforward. For each RNA family, you&#039;d like to have a Wiki page to harvest community thoughts on the structure, function, and evolution of that family. The RNA Biology mechanism provides a way of seeding those Wiki pages with seriously peer-reviewed science, but then they become true Wiki pages -- with all attendant benefits and risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to note that we abide by Wiki&#8217;s culture, including NPOV and no original research. The nature of the articles themselves in this section of RNA Biology is Wikipedia-like, for starters: they&#8217;re essentially minireviews, pulling together the literature. The RNA Biology paper is peer reviewed research, and it becomes the primary citation for the accompanying Wikipedia page; the Wiki page is not the original research. </p>
<p>The goal here is simple and straightforward. For each RNA family, you&#8217;d like to have a Wiki page to harvest community thoughts on the structure, function, and evolution of that family. The RNA Biology mechanism provides a way of seeding those Wiki pages with seriously peer-reviewed science, but then they become true Wiki pages &#8212; with all attendant benefits and risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Wikipedia User</title>
		<link>http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?p=24&#038;cpage=1#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>A Wikipedia User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selab.janelia.org/people/eddys/blog/?p=24#comment-51</guid>
		<description>This is an intriguing development. One of Wikipedia&#039;s five pillars is neutral point of view. Because of this, third-party sources are encouraged and original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. It will be interesting to see how the Wikipedia community reacts. I support this endeavor, but I feel publishers must be careful to abide by Wikipedia&#039;s policies and cite as often as possible to prevent claims of conflict of interest. I have the feeling that many of these pages will be speedily deleted by the Wikipedia community. Good luck in your research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an intriguing development. One of Wikipedia&#8217;s five pillars is neutral point of view. Because of this, third-party sources are encouraged and original research is not allowed on Wikipedia. It will be interesting to see how the Wikipedia community reacts. I support this endeavor, but I feel publishers must be careful to abide by Wikipedia&#8217;s policies and cite as often as possible to prevent claims of conflict of interest. I have the feeling that many of these pages will be speedily deleted by the Wikipedia community. Good luck in your research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
